Batman: A Death in the Family
Writer: Jim Starlin
Penciller: Jim Aparo
Inker: Mike De Carlo
Colourist: Adrienne Roy
Letters: John Costanza
Publisher: DC Comics
Today's guest review is by Jimmy McGlinchey:
Posing as a mild-mannered accountant, the entity known as @JimmyMcG on
Twitter is an enthusiastic DC Comics follower who has been collecting DC
comics since 1989. Other interests include travel, cinema, television
and trivia. You can follow him on twitter @JimmyMcG.
What’s it all about?
In the 1980s, Dick
Grayson had quit his role as Robin to Bruce Wayne’s Batman, moving
on up to the persona of Nightwing. His role as Robin was taken over
by Jason Todd, a young street orphan who Batman came across when
finding Jason trying to steal the tyres from the Batmobile. Todd was
a much darker incarnation than Dick Grayson’s Robin, prone to
defying Batman’s orders and being rebellious. In a comic before the
“Death in the Family” storyline, it was implied that Jason caused
the death of a serial rapist, who, being the son of a diplomat, would
escape prosecution for his crimes.
Jason Todd as Robin was not popular with the readers and, with the availability of technology to poll readers, DC Comics decided to use this to promote a storyline whereby the readers decided if Jason Todd should live or die.
As “Death in the Family” begins, Batman makes the decision to bench Jason Todd, fearing his emotional state would cause him injury. Jason, while suspended, makes a discovery that his mother was in fact his step-mother, and that three possibilities of his real mother were located in either the Middle East or Ethiopia. Jason sneaks away to try and locate his mother. However, Batman is also on the way to the Middle East as a certain escaped lunatic has absconded there with a stolen cruise missile in tow….
Jason Todd as Robin was not popular with the readers and, with the availability of technology to poll readers, DC Comics decided to use this to promote a storyline whereby the readers decided if Jason Todd should live or die.
As “Death in the Family” begins, Batman makes the decision to bench Jason Todd, fearing his emotional state would cause him injury. Jason, while suspended, makes a discovery that his mother was in fact his step-mother, and that three possibilities of his real mother were located in either the Middle East or Ethiopia. Jason sneaks away to try and locate his mother. However, Batman is also on the way to the Middle East as a certain escaped lunatic has absconded there with a stolen cruise missile in tow….
What’s
good about
it?
There is strong
characterisation throughout the book. Starlin and Aparo make a great
team, highlighting the characters’ motivations throughout the
storyline. Batman is a driven person, but this storyline shows him
struggling with emotions following the events depicted therein.
Jason, while brash and abrasive, comes across well here in places as
he searches for his mother, and his death, while horrific, is
presented as a heroic sacrifice by him. The Joker is a mixture of
insane madman and savvy criminal.
The removal of the action
from Gotham to the Middle East and Africa is a welcome change. Gotham
is very much Batman’s turf and it makes a nice change to see him in
more exotic locales.
While a self-contained
storyline, Starlin’s writing through appropriate flashbacks gives
readers the relevant backstory in a timely manner that does not slow
down the telling of the main story.
What’s bad about
it?
The plot is full of major
coincidences, which is typical of most comics of that era. Jason
flies off to Lebanon, and goes to a hotel which is the exact hotel
where Bruce has gone to find a suspect associated with the Joker.
Then, as Jason and Bruce go to Ethiopia, who should happen to go to
Ethiopia but the Joker. There are other coincidences like this which
are annoying if you happen to think too heavily about it.
The plot is very much a
product of its time. Middle East Conflict, references to the
Iran-Contra War and Reganomics, and a real life cameo that is very
silly in the extreme!
For some people, the
death scene may be quite extreme, especially the attack beforehand.
Finally, the ending of
the comic feels very flat and echoes Batman’s final word of the
storyline “Unresolved”.
What’s the art
like?
For me, Jim Aparo is one
of the pre-eminent Batman artists of the period. His Batman is dark,
but human. Aparo’s characters are muscular but realistic and lean –
no steroid musclemen or buxom women in Aparo-drawn comics. In these
stories, he is inked by Mike de Carlo, who tightens up Aparo’s
pencils and gives the characters a better definition than if Aparo
did the inks himself.
The fight scenes in the
storyline are very convincing. Aparo and De Carlo, along with
Starlin, who was himself an artist, understood the choreography of
fight scenes and you can feel every blow through the art.
There is also plenty of
emotion coming through the artwork – even when masked, Aparo’s
pencils convey Batman’s mood at all times, whether it is being
worry over Jason, frustration and anger when talking to a surprise
guest star or anxiety followed by sorrow when finally finding the
titular “death”.
The only negative I would
say about Aparo’s art is there is a lot of sameness about
characters. Stock bad guys tend to look alike, while the faces of
Bruce Wayne, Jason Todd and the aforementioned guest star looks
exactly the same. However, this is a very minor quibble.
To conclude, I would recommend this book for its historical
significance. Aparo’s art is always
worth getting and Starlin’s characterisation makes this an
enjoyable enough read. With this being comics however, the “death”
is subsequently reversed 20 years later, but that does not take away
from the impact of this book.
Other Information:
Price: £11.68 (Amazon)
ISBN: 1848568592
(Note: This book also
includes the storyline “A Lonely Place
of Dying”, a thematic sequel
to “Death in the
Family” which I hope to review later.)
Individual digital issues of Batman #426-429 are also available from Comixology at $1.99 per issue. This works out at about £1.20 or £1.50 per issue.
Editor's note - We've classified this as in the age ranges for teen and mature. It is most definitely not suitable for those under 12 and due to the violence is probably more suitable for the older, nearly adult, teenager, rather than the younger one. We considered labelling it as as Age: general but felt that might mislead some readers.
No comments:
Post a Comment